2003 NSDUH Data Collection Final Report

7. Data Collection Results

7.1 Overview

By following the data collection procedures already discussed, 170,762 units were selected. During the screening process, 143,485 units were identified as eligible, that is, the units were not vacant or only occupied by active-duty military personnel, or other similar circumstances. From this number of eligible cases, 130,605 were then screened successfully. The selection procedure in the Newton yielded 81,631 sample eligible dwelling units (DU) members. From this number, a total of 67,784 interviews were then completed.

7.2 Screening Response Rates

The screening response rate is the number of completed screenings divided by the Total screened dwelling units (SDUs) minus those SDUs not eligible to be included in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Ineligibles include vacants, not primary residence, not a DU, group quarters unit (GQU) listed as housing unit (HU), HU listed as GQU, only military, other ineligibles, and those SDUs where the residents will live there less than half of the quarter.

As a brief summary, Table 7.1 lists the sample totals and the national screening and interview response rates for the 2001, 2002, and 2003 surveys. Then, Tables 7.2 through 7.15 present the screening response rates for the 2003 sample nationwide. Within each pair of tables, the first provides the unweighted percentages, while the second provides the weighted percentages. The final national screening response rates for the 2003 NSDUH were 91.02 percent (unweighted) and 90.72 percent (weighted).

Tables 7.2 and 7.3 show the national totals for the various screening results codes as broken down by population density. Tables 7.4 and 7.5 redistribute the complete and incomplete screening results codes shown in the previous two tables. The next sets of tables list results for each State, broken down by population density (7.6 and 7.7), eligibility rate (7.8 and 7.9), completion rate (7.10 and 7.11), and nonresponse rate (7.12 and 7.13). Tables 7.14 and 7.15 show the reasons given for screening refusals for the national totals and then, in alphabetical order, for each State. Both unweighted and weighted tables are presented together for each State.

7.3 Interview Response Rates

The interviewing response rate is the number of completed interviews divided by the total number of eligible respondents chosen through screening. If there are any ineligible respondents (under 12 or actually in the military), these are subtracted from the total. The national rates for 2001, 2002, and 2003 are shown in Table 7.1. The effect of the $30 cash incentive implemented for 2002 and 2003 is apparent when comparing between survey years.

Tables 7.16 through 7.27 present the interview response rates for the national sample. The final national interviewing response rates were 83.04 percent (unweighted) and 77.39 percent (weighted).

Tables 7.18 and 7.19 present, in alphabetical order, the unweighted and weighted interview response rates for each State by age group. Both tables are presented on each State's page. Similarly, Tables 7.20 and 7.21 show national and State results of incomplete interviews by age, while Tables 7.22 and 7.23 contain interview refusal reasons by age group for the Nation and for each State.

Remaining interview result tables are presented in pairs with the first table providing the unweighted percentages and the second table providing the weighted percentages. Tables 7.16 and 7.17 show the interview response rates by age group and gender. More detailed information by gender and smaller age groups is shown in Tables 7.24 and 7.25. Tables 7.26 and 7.27 present a summary of the interview response rates broken down by several factors including race, type of county, geographic region, and gender.

7.4 Spanish Interviews

The percentages of completed interviews that were conducted in Spanish are shown by State in Table 7.28 (unweighted) and Table 7.29 (weighted). Spanish interviewing percentages also were analyzed by age and county type in Table 7.30 (unweighted) and Table 7.31 (weighted). Table 7.32 presents the number of English- and Spanish-version interviews conducted by region and by population density.

7.5 Interviewer Assessment of the Interview

As part of each computer-assisted interviewing (CAI) interview, field interviewers (FIs) were required to assess the respondent's level of cooperation, understanding, and privacy during the interview. FIs also were asked to record whether the respondent needed assistance during the audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) questions and what type and amount of assistance the FI provided. Other questions asked whether the laptop seemed to influence the respondent's choice to participate, and if respondents revealed to the FI answers entered during the ACASI section.

All of these data were captured in the FI Observation Questions at the end of the interview and are summarized in Tables 7.33 through 7.38. Table 7.33 shows the FI's assessment of the need to provide assistance to respondents in the ACASI section. Tables 7.34 through 7.38 present data based on the FI's assessment of the respondent's level of understanding of the interview, the respondent's cooperation during the interview, the level of privacy during the interview, how the laptop influenced participation, and finally how often the respondent revealed answers in the ACASI section. Each of these tables is broken down by age and race/ethnicity.

7.6 Number of Visits

FIs were required to make at least five visits to DUs when attempting to complete screening and interviewing. In reality, callbacks continued to be made as long as the field supervisor (FS) felt there was a chance that the screening or the interview could be completed in a cost-effective manner. In some cases, more than 10 visits were made to complete a screening or interview. Tables 7.39 and 7.40 present data on the number of visits required to complete screenings and interviews.

**Table 7.1 Summary of NSDUH Results**
	2001		2002		2003
Eligible DUs	171,519		150,162		143,485
Complete Screenings	157,471		136,349		130,605
	Unweighted	Weighted	Unweighted	Weighted	Unweighted	Weighted
Screening Response Rate	91.81	91.86	90.80	90.72	91.02	90.72
Selected Persons	89,745		80,581		81,631
Completed Interviews	68,929		68,126		67,784
	Unweighted	Weighted	Unweighted	Weighted	Unweighted	Weighted
Interviewing Response Rate	76.81	73.31	84.54	78.56	83.04	77.39
	Unweighted	Weighted	Unweighted	Weighted	Unweighted	Weighted
Overall Response Rate	70.52	67.34	76.76	71.27	75.58	70.21

**Table 7.2 2003 Screening Results, by Population Density (Unweighted Percentages)**
Screening Result	1,000,000+		50,000 – 999,999		Non-MSA		Total
Screening Result	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample	60,198	100.00	61,050	100.00	49,514	100.00	170,762	100.00
Ineligible Cases	7,627	12.67	8,955	14.67	10,695	21.60	27,277	15.97
Eligible Cases	52,571	87.33	52,095	85.33	38,819	78.40	143,485	84.03
Ineligibles	7,627	100.00	8,955	100.00	10,695	100.00	27,277	100.00
10 – Vacant	4,472	58.63	4,898	54.70	5,218	48.79	14,588	53.48
13 – Not Primary Residence	564	7.39	977	10.91	2,836	26.52	4,377	16.05
18 – Not a Dwelling Unit	707	9.27	735	8.21	907	8.48	2,349	8.61
22 – All Military Personnel	87	1.14	218	2.43	51	0.48	356	1.31
Other, Ineligible	1,797	23.56	2,127	23.75	1,683	15.74	5,607	20.56
Eligible Cases	52,571	100.00	52,095	100.00	38,819	100.00	143,485	100.00
Screening Complete	45,952	87.41	48,083	92.30	36,570	94.21	130,605	91.02
30 – No One Selected	25,775	49.03	27,215	52.24	21,320	54.92	74,310	51.79
31 – One Selected	10,913	20.76	11,417	21.92	8,372	21.57	30,702	21.40
32 – Two Selected	9,264	17.62	9,451	18.14	6,878	17.72	25,593	17.84
Screening Not Complete	6,619	12.59	4,012	7.70	2,249	5.79	12,880	8.98
11 – No One Home	1,219	2.32	727	1.40	500	1.29	2,446	1.70
12 – Respondent Unavailable	144	0.27	89	0.17	47	0.12	280	0.20
14 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	99	0.19	112	0.21	79	0.20	290	0.20
15 – Lang Barrier – Hispanic	11	0.02	12	0.02	19	0.05	42	0.03
16 – Lang Barrier – Other	329	0.63	106	0.20	15	0.04	450	0.31
17 – Refusal	4,060	7.72	2,812	5.40	1,542	3.97	8,414	5.86
21 – Other, Access Denied	743	1.41	147	0.28	33	0.09	923	0.64
24 – Other, eligible	2	0.00	5	0.01	5	0.01	12	0.01
27 – Segment Not Accessible	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
33 – Screener Not Returned	11	0.02	2	0.00	3	0.01	16	0.01
39 – Fraudulent Case	1	0.00	0	0.00	5	0.01	6	0.00
44 – Electronic Scr Problem	0	0.00	0	0.00	1	0.00	1	0.00

**Table 7.3 2003 Screening Results, by Population Density (Weighted Percentages)**
Screening Result	1,000,000+		50,000 – 999,999		Non-MSA		Total
Screening Result	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample	60,198	100.00	61,050	100.00	49,514	100.00	170,762	100.00
Ineligible Cases	7,627	12.99	8,955	15.13	10,695	21.92	27,277	15.84
Eligible Cases	52,571	87.01	52,095	84.87	38,819	78.08	143,485	84.16
Ineligibles	7,627	100.00	8,955	100.00	10,695	100.00	27,277	100.00
10 – Vacant	4,472	52.63	4,898	55.14	5,218	49.97	14,588	52.56
13 – Not Primary Residence	564	12.54	977	12.55	2,836	26.24	4,377	17.07
18 – Not a Dwelling Unit	707	8.53	735	7.57	907	8.10	2,349	8.08
22 – All Military Personnel	87	1.58	218	2.20	51	0.42	356	1.39
Other, Ineligible	1,797	24.72	2,127	22.55	1,683	15.26	5,607	20.90
Eligible Cases	52,571	100.00	52,095	100.00	38,819	100.00	143,485	100.00
Screening Complete	45,952	87.75	48,083	92.34	36,570	94.13	130,605	90.72
30 – No One Selected	25,775	48.35	27,215	52.01	21,320	54.89	74,310	51.04
31 – One Selected	10,913	21.02	11,417	21.98	8,372	21.54	30,702	21.46
32 – Two Selected	9,264	18.38	9,451	18.35	6,878	17.70	25,593	18.22
Screening Not Complete	6,619	12.25	4,012	7.66	2,249	5.87	12,880	9.28
11 – No One Home	1,219	2.03	727	1.48	500	1.30	2,446	1.68
12 – Respondent Unavailable	144	0.22	89	0.17	47	0.13	280	0.18
14 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	99	0.17	112	0.19	79	0.21	290	0.18
15 – Lang Barrier – Hispanic	11	0.02	12	0.02	19	0.07	42	0.03
16 – Lang Barrier – Other	329	0.71	106	0.20	15	0.03	450	0.39
17 – Refusal	4,060	7.53	2,812	5.32	1,542	3.94	8,414	5.98
21 – Other, Access Denied	743	1.55	147	0.26	33	0.15	923	0.81
24 – Other, eligible	2	0.01	5	0.01	5	0.01	12	0.01
27 – Segment Not Accessible	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
33 – Screener Not Returned	11	0.02	2	0.00	3	0.00	16	0.01
39 – Fraudulent Case	1	0.00	0	0.00	5	0.02	6	0.00
44 – Electronic Scr Problem	0	0.00	0	0.00	1	0.00	1	0.00

**Table 7.4 2003 Screening Results, by Final Result and Population Density (Unweighted Percentages)**
Screening Result	1,000,000+		50,000 – 999,999		Non-MSA		Total
Screening Result	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Screening Complete	45,952	100.00	48,083	100.00	36,570	100.00	130,605	100.00
30 – No One Selected	25,775	56.09	27,215	56.60	21,320	58.30	74,310	56.90
31 – One Selected	10,913	23.75	11,417	23.74	8,372	22.89	30,702	23.51
32 – Two Selected	9,264	20.16	9,451	19.66	6,878	18.81	25,593	19.60
Screening Not Complete	6,619	100.00	4,012	100.00	2,249	100.00	12,880	100.00
11 – No One Home	1,219	18.42	727	18.12	500	22.23	2,446	18.99
12 – Respondent Unavailable	144	2.18	89	2.22	47	2.09	280	2.17
14 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	99	1.50	112	2.79	79	3.51	290	2.25
15 – Lang Barrier – Hispanic	11	0.17	12	0.30	19	0.84	42	0.33
16 – Lang Barrier – Other	329	4.97	106	2.64	15	0.67	450	3.49
17 – Refusal	4,060	61.34	2,812	70.09	1,542	68.56	8,414	65.33
21 – Other, Access Denied	743	11.23	147	3.66	33	1.47	923	7.17
24 – Other, eligible	2	0.03	5	0.12	5	0.22	12	0.09
27 – Segment Not Accessible	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
33 – Screener Not Returned	11	0.17	2	0.05	3	0.13	16	0.12
39 – Fraudulent Case	1	0.02	0	0.00	5	0.22	6	0.05
44 – Electronic Scr Problem	0	0.00	0	0.00	1	0.04	1	0.01

**Table 7.5 2003 Screening Results, by Final Result and Population Density (Weighted Percentages)**
Screening Result	1,000,000+		50,000 – 999,999		Non-MSA		Total
Screening Result	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Screening Complete	45,952	100.00	48,083	100.00	36,570	100.00	130,605	100.00
30 – No One Selected	25,775	55.10	27,215	56.33	21,320	58.31	74,310	56.26
31 – One Selected	10,913	23.95	11,417	23.81	8,372	22.89	30,702	23.66
32 – Two Selected	9,264	20.95	9,451	19.87	6,878	18.80	25,593	20.08
Screening Not Complete	6,619	100.00	4,012	100.00	2,249	100.00	12,880	100.00
11 – No One Home	1,219	16.58	727	19.28	500	22.11	2,446	18.11
12 – Respondent Unavailable	144	1.78	89	2.28	47	2.24	280	1.99
14 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	99	1.41	112	2.43	79	3.54	290	1.99
15 – Lang Barrier – Hispanic	11	0.14	12	0.27	19	1.25	42	0.33
16 – Lang Barrier – Other	329	5.79	106	2.63	15	0.51	450	4.16
17 – Refusal	4,060	61.45	2,812	69.47	1,542	67.20	8,414	64.51
21 – Other, Access Denied	743	12.67	147	3.46	33	2.63	923	8.68
24 – Other, eligible	2	0.04	5	0.14	5	0.17	12	0.09
27 – Segment Not Accessible	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
33 – Screener Not Returned	11	0.14	2	0.04	3	0.07	16	0.11
39 – Fraudulent Case	1	0.00	0	0.00	5	0.27	6	0.04
44 – Electronic Scr Problem	0	0.00	0	0.00	1	0.01	1	0.00

**Table 7.6 2003 Screening Results — Completion Rate, by State and Population Density (Unweighted Percentages)**
State	1,000,000+		50,000 – 999,999		Non-MSA		Total
State	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total U.S.	45,952	87.41	48,083	92.30	36,570	94.21	130,605	91.02
AK	0	0.00	739	89.90	927	93.45	1,666	91.84
AL	0	0.00	1,125	90.80	433	91.54	1,558	91.00
AR	0	0.00	707	94.90	1,060	95.93	1,767	95.51
AZ	1,034	94.17	271	93.45	357	96.75	1,662	94.59
CA	4,637	86.62	1,068	93.28	310	86.11	6,015	87.71
CO	872	90.93	539	93.09	298	94.01	1,709	92.13
CT	669	88.84	1,242	91.39	162	92.05	2,073	90.60
DC	2,576	83.69	0	0.00	0	0.00	2,576	83.69
DE	0	0.00	1,127	90.96	647	92.83	1,774	91.63
FL	3,451	87.99	3,285	90.65	839	92.50	7,575	89.61
GA	764	90.63	278	95.86	570	94.84	1,612	92.96
HI	0	0.00	1,222	90.92	545	89.49	1,767	90.48
IA	0	0.00	785	93.23	936	94.83	1,721	94.10
ID	0	0.00	408	94.23	1,101	94.67	1,509	94.55
IL	3,659	79.05	1,846	89.09	1,298	90.96	6,803	83.70
IN	434	93.74	730	93.47	473	95.17	1,637	94.03
KS	487	91.89	485	93.63	666	95.69	1,638	93.92
KY	141	97.24	761	93.26	976	94.76	1,878	94.32
LA	406	87.31	817	94.78	414	96.28	1,637	93.17
MA	1,184	87.83	564	88.13	130	92.20	1,878	88.21
MD	1,231	87.49	78	93.98	166	90.71	1,475	88.16
ME	0	0.00	910	90.73	1,135	91.75	2,045	91.29
MI	3,032	88.04	2,311	91.45	1,366	92.55	6,709	90.09
MN	920	92.28	193	92.79	560	93.96	1,673	92.89
MO	989	94.19	260	91.23	663	93.78	1,912	93.63
MS	0	0.00	545	93.48	1,105	96.17	1,650	95.27
MT	0	0.00	386	92.57	1,380	94.91	1,766	94.39
NC	246	92.48	790	94.50	717	95.60	1,753	94.65
ND	0	0.00	766	92.96	853	95.84	1,619	94.46
NE	0	0.00	823	93.20	799	95.92	1,622	94.52
NH	0	0.00	998	92.84	570	92.99	1,568	92.89
NJ	1,293	87.42	688	85.15	0	0.00	1,981	86.62
NM	0	0.00	900	95.44	840	95.56	1,740	95.50
NV	0	0.00	1,378	94.90	285	95.32	1,663	94.97
NY	4,767	81.06	1,749	89.88	689	92.11	7,205	84.02
OH	2,884	92.79	2,801	95.08	1,561	95.42	7,246	94.23
OK	0	0.00	1,079	91.05	733	93.14	1,812	91.89
OR	812	94.97	429	94.49	519	95.40	1,760	94.98
PA	3,391	85.52	2,846	95.31	1,245	95.70	7,482	90.67
RI	0	0.00	1,543	88.73	229	90.87	1,772	89.00
SC	67	97.10	1,019	94.53	637	96.52	1,723	95.35
SD	0	0.00	619	92.66	1,041	96.30	1,660	94.91
TN	0	0.00	1,270	93.93	594	94.89	1,864	94.24
TX	3,201	94.12	1,836	93.34	1,042	94.90	6,079	94.01
UT	810	94.19	229	96.22	286	97.28	1,325	95.19
VA	771	86.05	424	86.18	472	90.77	1,667	87.37
VT	0	0.00	444	90.98	1,465	93.97	1,909	93.26
WA	771	94.14	820	94.69	329	94.54	1,920	94.44
WI	453	92.83	645	90.21	557	94.41	1,655	92.30
WV	0	0.00	848	92.37	1,388	94.68	2,236	93.79
WY	0	0.00	457	93.27	1,202	94.94	1,659	94.48

**Table 7.7 2003 Screening Results — Completion Rate, by State and Population Density (Weighted Percentages)**
State	1,000,000+		50,000 – 999,999		Non-MSA		Total
State	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total U.S.	45,952	87.75	48,083	92.34	36,570	94.13	130,605	90.72
AK	0	0.00	739	89.93	927	93.65	1,666	91.97
AL	0	0.00	1,125	91.01	433	91.53	1,558	91.14
AR	0	0.00	707	95.01	1,060	95.90	1,767	95.53
AZ	1,034	94.21	271	93.65	357	96.46	1,662	94.64
CA	4,637	85.55	1,068	93.37	310	86.25	6,015	86.86
CO	872	90.92	539	92.89	298	93.99	1,709	92.06
CT	669	88.93	1,242	91.26	162	92.10	2,073	90.56
DC	2,576	83.69	0	0.00	0	0.00	2,576	83.69
DE	0	0.00	1,127	90.71	647	93.08	1,774	91.59
FL	3,451	88.18	3,285	90.72	839	92.77	7,575	89.77
GA	764	90.44	278	95.64	570	94.83	1,612	92.81
HI	0	0.00	1,222	90.62	545	89.44	1,767	90.25
IA	0	0.00	785	93.30	936	94.90	1,721	94.16
ID	0	0.00	408	94.17	1,101	94.56	1,509	94.45
IL	3,659	78.68	1,846	88.90	1,298	91.06	6,803	83.45
IN	434	93.80	730	93.61	473	95.18	1,637	94.11
KS	487	91.81	485	93.81	666	95.68	1,638	93.94
KY	141	97.42	761	93.01	976	94.87	1,878	94.25
LA	406	87.23	817	94.73	414	96.16	1,637	93.12
MA	1,184	87.74	564	88.12	130	92.34	1,878	88.16
MD	1,231	87.37	78	93.97	166	89.98	1,475	88.04
ME	0	0.00	910	90.63	1,135	91.68	2,045	91.21
MI	3,032	88.10	2,311	91.48	1,366	92.60	6,709	90.14
MN	920	92.03	193	92.67	560	93.94	1,673	92.73
MO	989	94.19	260	91.40	663	93.74	1,912	93.64
MS	0	0.00	545	93.46	1,105	96.23	1,650	95.33
MT	0	0.00	386	92.63	1,380	94.90	1,766	94.40
NC	246	92.42	790	94.49	717	95.65	1,753	94.65
ND	0	0.00	766	93.17	853	95.89	1,619	94.57
NE	0	0.00	823	93.17	799	95.94	1,622	94.51
NH	0	0.00	998	92.72	570	93.33	1,568	92.94
NJ	1,293	87.35	688	85.12	0	0.00	1,981	86.56
NM	0	0.00	900	95.20	840	95.66	1,740	95.42
NV	0	0.00	1,378	94.83	285	95.29	1,663	94.91
NY	4,767	81.02	1,749	89.80	689	92.04	7,205	83.97
OH	2,884	92.73	2,801	95.05	1,561	95.41	7,246	94.17
OK	0	0.00	1,079	90.95	733	93.03	1,812	91.80
OR	812	95.16	429	93.97	519	95.37	1,760	94.94
PA	3,391	85.66	2,846	95.15	1,245	95.80	7,482	90.76
RI	0	0.00	1,543	88.33	229	90.30	1,772	88.58
SC	67	97.19	1,019	94.73	637	96.45	1,723	95.45
SD	0	0.00	619	92.47	1,041	96.24	1,660	94.78
TN	0	0.00	1,270	94.01	594	94.99	1,864	94.27
TX	3,201	94.13	1,836	93.33	1,042	94.97	6,079	94.03
UT	810	94.04	229	96.49	286	97.31	1,325	95.14
VA	771	86.02	424	86.09	472	90.73	1,667	87.33
VT	0	0.00	444	90.89	1,465	93.90	1,909	93.19
WA	771	94.10	820	94.80	329	94.33	1,920	94.43
WI	453	92.84	645	90.26	557	94.24	1,655	92.28
WV	0	0.00	848	92.47	1,388	94.71	2,236	93.83
WY	0	0.00	457	93.24	1,202	94.95	1,659	94.48

**Table 7.8 2003 Screening Results — Eligibility Rate, by State (Unweighted Percentages)**
State	Sample DUs	Eligible DUs	% Eligible DUs
Total	170,762	143,485	84.03
AK	2,314	1,814	78.39
AL	2,071	1,712	82.67
AR	2,258	1,850	81.93
AZ	2,159	1,757	81.38
CA	7,687	6,858	89.22
CO	2,225	1,855	83.37
CT	2,623	2,288	87.23
DC	3,692	3,078	83.37
DE	2,419	1,936	80.03
FL	10,451	8,453	80.88
GA	2,112	1,734	82.10
HI	2,259	1,953	86.45
IA	2,035	1,829	89.88
ID	1,998	1,596	79.88
IL	9,163	8,128	88.70
IN	2,046	1,741	85.09
KS	2,042	1,744	85.41
KY	2,266	1,991	87.86
LA	2,084	1,757	84.31
MA	2,413	2,129	88.23
MD	1,899	1,673	88.10
ME	2,827	2,240	79.24
MI	9,000	7,447	82.74
MN	2,029	1,801	88.76
MO	2,495	2,042	81.84
MS	2,196	1,732	78.87
MT	2,384	1,871	78.48
NC	2,239	1,852	82.72
ND	2,072	1,714	82.72
NE	1,996	1,716	85.97
NH	2,015	1,688	83.77
NJ	2,564	2,287	89.20
NM	2,260	1,822	80.62
NV	2,071	1,751	84.55
NY	9,973	8,575	85.98
OH	8,874	7,690	86.66
OK	2,455	1,972	80.33
OR	2,102	1,853	88.15
PA	9,866	8,252	83.64
RI	2,255	1,991	88.29
SC	2,205	1,807	81.95
SD	2,154	1,749	81.20
TN	2,290	1,978	86.38
TX	7,901	6,466	81.84
UT	1,623	1,392	85.77
VA	2,168	1,908	88.01
VT	2,638	2,047	77.60
WA	2,475	2,033	82.14
WI	2,282	1,793	78.57
WV	2,923	2,384	81.56
WY	2,214	1,756	79.31
DU=dwelling unit.

**Table 7.9 2003 Screening Results — Eligibility Rate, by State (Weighted Percentages)**
State	Sample DUs	Eligible DUs	% Eligible DUs
Total	170,762	143,485	84.16
AK	2,314	1,814	78.29
AL	2,071	1,712	82.59
AR	2,258	1,850	81.69
AZ	2,159	1,757	76.61
CA	7,687	6,858	86.71
CO	2,225	1,855	83.11
CT	2,623	2,288	87.11
DC	3,692	3,078	83.49
DE	2,419	1,936	77.52
FL	10,451	8,453	78.88
GA	2,112	1,734	82.31
HI	2,259	1,953	86.59
IA	2,035	1,829	89.84
ID	1,998	1,596	79.05
IL	9,163	8,128	88.80
IN	2,046	1,741	85.04
KS	2,042	1,744	85.50
KY	2,266	1,991	88.28
LA	2,084	1,757	84.70
MA	2,413	2,129	88.05
MD	1,899	1,673	88.10
ME	2,827	2,240	79.13
MI	9,000	7,447	81.95
MN	2,029	1,801	89.22
MO	2,495	2,042	81.73
MS	2,196	1,732	79.16
MT	2,384	1,871	78.55
NC	2,239	1,852	82.67
ND	2,072	1,714	82.88
NE	1,996	1,716	85.97
NH	2,015	1,688	83.17
NJ	2,564	2,287	89.19
NM	2,260	1,822	80.94
NV	2,071	1,751	85.37
NY	9,973	8,575	86.04
OH	8,874	7,690	86.62
OK	2,455	1,972	80.20
OR	2,102	1,853	88.24
PA	9,866	8,252	83.16
RI	2,255	1,991	88.52
SC	2,205	1,807	81.62
SD	2,154	1,749	81.64
TN	2,290	1,978	87.76
TX	7,901	6,466	81.76
UT	1,623	1,392	84.47
VA	2,168	1,908	87.17
VT	2,638	2,047	77.40
WA	2,475	2,033	81.85
WI	2,282	1,793	76.73
WV	2,923	2,384	81.77
WY	2,214	1,756	79.26
DU=dwelling unit.

**Table 7.10 2003 Screening Results — Completion Rate, by State (Unweighted Percentages)**
State	Eligible DUs	Complete DUs	% Complete DUs
Total	143,485	130,605	91.02
AK	1,814	1,666	91.84
AL	1,712	1,558	91.00
AR	1,850	1,767	95.51
AZ	1,757	1,662	94.59
CA	6,858	6,015	87.71
CO	1,855	1,709	92.13
CT	2,288	2,073	90.60
DC	3,078	2,576	83.69
DE	1,936	1,774	91.63
FL	8,453	7,575	89.61
GA	1,734	1,612	92.96
HI	1,953	1,767	90.48
IA	1,829	1,721	94.10
ID	1,596	1,509	94.55
IL	8,128	6,803	83.70
IN	1,741	1,637	94.03
KS	1,744	1,638	93.92
KY	1,991	1,878	94.32
LA	1,757	1,637	93.17
MA	2,129	1,878	88.21
MD	1,673	1,475	88.16
ME	2,240	2,045	91.29
MI	7,447	6,709	90.09
MN	1,801	1,673	92.89
MO	2,042	1,912	93.63
MS	1,732	1,650	95.27
MT	1,871	1,766	94.39
NC	1,852	1,753	94.65
ND	1,714	1,619	94.46
NE	1,716	1,622	94.52
NH	1,688	1,568	92.89
NJ	2,287	1,981	86.62
NM	1,822	1,740	95.50
NV	1,751	1,663	94.97
NY	8,575	7,205	84.02
OH	7,690	7,246	94.23
OK	1,972	1,812	91.89
OR	1,853	1,760	94.98
PA	8,252	7,482	90.67
RI	1,991	1,772	89.00
SC	1,807	1,723	95.35
SD	1,749	1,660	94.91
TN	1,978	1,864	94.24
TX	6,466	6,079	94.01
UT	1,392	1,325	95.19
VA	1,908	1,667	87.37
VT	2,047	1,909	93.26
WA	2,033	1,920	94.44
WI	1,793	1,655	92.30
WV	2,384	2,236	93.79
WY	1,756	1,659	94.48
DU=dwelling unit.

**Table 7.11 2003 Screening Results — Completion Rate, by State (Weighted Percentages)**
State	Eligible DUs	Complete DUs	% Complete DUs
Total	143,485	130,605	90.72
AK	1,814	1,666	91.97
AL	1,712	1,558	91.14
AR	1,850	1,767	95.53
AZ	1,757	1,662	94.64
CA	6,858	6,015	86.86
CO	1,855	1,709	92.06
CT	2,288	2,073	90.56
DC	3,078	2,576	83.69
DE	1,936	1,774	91.59
FL	8,453	7,575	89.77
GA	1,734	1,612	92.81
HI	1,953	1,767	90.25
IA	1,829	1,721	94.16
ID	1,596	1,509	94.45
IL	8,128	6,803	83.45
IN	1,741	1,637	94.11
KS	1,744	1,638	93.94
KY	1,991	1,878	94.25
LA	1,757	1,637	93.12
MA	2,129	1,878	88.16
MD	1,673	1,475	88.04
ME	2,240	2,045	91.21
MI	7,447	6,709	90.14
MN	1,801	1,673	92.73
MO	2,042	1,912	93.64
MS	1,732	1,650	95.33
MT	1,871	1,766	94.40
NC	1,852	1,753	94.65
ND	1,714	1,619	94.57
NE	1,716	1,622	94.51
NH	1,688	1,568	92.94
NJ	2,287	1,981	86.56
NM	1,822	1,740	95.42
NV	1,751	1,663	94.91
NY	8,575	7,205	83.97
OH	7,690	7,246	94.17
OK	1,972	1,812	91.80
OR	1,853	1,760	94.94
PA	8,252	7,482	90.76
RI	1,991	1,772	88.58
SC	1,807	1,723	95.45
SD	1,749	1,660	94.78
TN	1,978	1,864	94.27
TX	6,466	6,079	94.03
UT	1,392	1,325	95.14
VA	1,908	1,667	87.33
VT	2,047	1,909	93.19
WA	2,033	1,920	94.43
WI	1,793	1,655	92.28
WV	2,384	2,236	93.83
WY	1,756	1,659	94.48
DU=dwelling unit.

**Table 7.12 2003 Screening Results — Nonresponse Rate, by State (Unweighted Percentages)**
State	Total NR %	% Not at Home	% Refused
Total	8.98	1.70	5.86
AK	8.16	1.65	5.62
AL	9.00	3.33	5.26
AR	4.49	0.70	3.08
AZ	5.41	0.46	4.78
CA	12.29	1.59	7.12
CO	7.87	0.86	6.47
CT	9.40	1.70	6.56
DC	16.31	4.13	10.69
DE	8.37	1.55	5.84
FL	10.39	1.25	7.15
GA	7.04	0.69	5.59
HI	9.52	1.48	6.09
IA	5.90	1.04	4.54
ID	5.45	1.13	3.70
IL	16.30	4.24	8.23
IN	5.97	1.55	4.19
KS	6.08	1.09	4.42
KY	5.68	1.71	3.82
LA	6.83	1.42	4.78
MA	11.79	2.63	8.31
MD	11.84	2.09	7.71
ME	8.71	1.25	6.52
MI	9.91	1.89	7.02
MN	7.11	1.50	5.11
MO	6.37	1.76	4.36
MS	4.73	1.62	2.77
MT	5.61	1.44	4.12
NC	5.35	0.81	4.05
ND	5.54	0.93	3.97
NE	5.48	1.11	3.96
NH	7.11	0.71	5.98
NJ	13.38	2.97	9.31
NM	4.50	1.54	2.74
NV	5.03	1.71	2.97
NY	15.98	2.09	10.24
OH	5.77	0.91	4.11
OK	8.11	0.91	6.09
OR	5.02	1.57	2.70
PA	9.33	1.91	4.53
RI	11.00	1.41	8.34
SC	4.65	1.22	2.99
SD	5.09	1.14	3.60
TN	5.76	1.62	3.54
TX	5.99	1.50	3.91
UT	4.81	0.93	3.23
VA	12.63	2.31	8.60
VT	6.74	0.64	5.37
WA	5.56	0.54	4.67
WI	7.70	2.29	5.35
WV	6.21	0.96	4.32
WY	5.52	1.08	4.27
NR = nonresponse.

**Table 7.13 2003 Screening Results — Nonresponse Rate, by State (Weighted Percentages)**
State	Total NR %	% Not at Home	% Refused
Total	9.28	1.68	5.98
AK	8.03	1.61	5.44
AL	8.86	3.21	5.22
AR	4.47	0.71	3.09
AZ	5.36	0.46	4.76
CA	13.14	1.56	7.21
CO	7.94	0.86	6.54
CT	9.44	1.64	6.68
DC	16.31	4.12	10.70
DE	8.41	1.48	5.85
FL	10.23	1.27	7.09
GA	7.19	0.77	5.65
HI	9.75	1.49	6.07
IA	5.84	1.06	4.46
ID	5.55	1.10	3.82
IL	16.55	4.24	8.30
IN	5.89	1.58	4.10
KS	6.06	1.11	4.42
KY	5.75	1.86	3.77
LA	6.88	1.42	4.84
MA	11.84	2.66	8.32
MD	11.96	2.12	7.79
ME	8.79	1.31	6.52
MI	9.86	1.87	6.99
MN	7.27	1.51	5.25
MO	6.36	1.77	4.35
MS	4.67	1.60	2.76
MT	5.60	1.39	4.16
NC	5.35	0.80	4.06
ND	5.43	0.92	3.85
NE	5.49	1.11	3.97
NH	7.06	0.70	5.97
NJ	13.44	2.93	9.36
NM	4.58	1.58	2.81
NV	5.09	1.91	2.77
NY	16.03	2.09	10.24
OH	5.83	0.91	4.13
OK	8.20	0.94	6.10
OR	5.06	1.54	2.65
PA	9.24	1.88	4.53
RI	11.42	1.31	8.78
SC	4.55	1.15	2.97
SD	5.22	1.19	3.64
TN	5.73	1.37	3.87
TX	5.97	1.49	3.91
UT	4.86	0.95	3.27
VA	12.67	2.21	8.63
VT	6.81	0.62	5.45
WA	5.57	0.49	4.72
WI	7.72	2.29	5.37
WV	6.17	0.98	4.28
WY	5.52	1.09	4.26
NR=nonresponse.

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Total U.S.)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	8,414	100.00
Nothing in it for me	5,199	61.79
No time	1,173	13.94
Government/Surveys too invasive	1,250	14.86
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	89	1.06
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	357	4.24
House too messy/Too ill	68	0.81
Other	273	3.24
Missing	5	0.06

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	8,414	100.00
Nothing in it for me	5,199	62.19
No time	1,173	13.82
Government/Surveys too invasive	1,250	14.60
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	89	1.04
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	357	4.11
House too messy/Too ill	68	0.92
Other	273	3.23
Missing	5	0.09

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Alabama)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	90	100.00
Nothing in it for me	26	28.89
No time	41	45.56
Government/Surveys too invasive	17	18.89
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	2.22
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	4	4.44
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	90	100.00
Nothing in it for me	26	27.23
No time	41	44.63
Government/Surveys too invasive	17	20.81
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.92
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	4	5.41
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Alaska)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	102	100.00
Nothing in it for me	55	53.92
No time	17	16.67
Government/Surveys too invasive	26	25.49
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	0.98
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	1.96
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.98
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	102	100.00
Nothing in it for me	55	55.87
No time	17	15.84
Government/Surveys too invasive	26	24.39
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	0.84
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	2.11
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.95
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Arizona)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	84	100.00
Nothing in it for me	31	36.90
No time	13	15.48
Government/Surveys too invasive	32	38.10
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	5.95
House too messy/Too ill	2	2.38
Other	1	1.19
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	84	100.00
Nothing in it for me	31	36.45
No time	13	13.45
Government/Surveys too invasive	32	40.28
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	5.23
House too messy/Too ill	2	2.88
Other	1	1.71
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Arkansas)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	57	100.00
Nothing in it for me	34	59.65
No time	5	8.77
Government/Surveys too invasive	2	3.51
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.75
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	15	26.32
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	57	100.00
Nothing in it for me	34	60.88
No time	5	8.86
Government/Surveys too invasive	2	3.42
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.87
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	15	24.97
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (California)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	488	100.00
Nothing in it for me	325	66.60
No time	60	12.30
Government/Surveys too invasive	79	16.19
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	0.20
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	10	2.05
House too messy/Too ill	4	0.82
Other	9	1.84
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	488	100.00
Nothing in it for me	325	66.41
No time	60	12.84
Government/Surveys too invasive	79	15.98
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	0.20
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	10	1.95
House too messy/Too ill	4	0.85
Other	9	1.77
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Colorado)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	120	100.00
Nothing in it for me	75	62.50
No time	9	7.50
Government/Surveys too invasive	24	20.00
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	0.83
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	8	6.67
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.83
Other	2	1.67
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	120	100.00
Nothing in it for me	75	63.45
No time	9	7.39
Government/Surveys too invasive	24	19.44
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	0.84
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	8	6.44
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.81
Other	2	1.62
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Connecticut)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	150	100.00
Nothing in it for me	121	80.67
No time	7	4.67
Government/Surveys too invasive	12	8.00
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	0.67
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	6	4.00
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.67
Other	2	1.33
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	150	100.00
Nothing in it for me	121	81.29
No time	7	4.64
Government/Surveys too invasive	12	7.63
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	0.59
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	6	3.89
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.58
Other	2	1.38
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Delaware)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	113	100.00
Nothing in it for me	73	64.60
No time	13	11.50
Government/Surveys too invasive	19	16.81
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.77
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	3	2.65
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.88
Other	2	1.77
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	113	100.00
Nothing in it for me	73	63.47
No time	13	11.40
Government/Surveys too invasive	19	17.61
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.87
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	3	2.46
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.45
Other	2	1.73
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (District of Columbia)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	329	100.00
Nothing in it for me	209	63.53
No time	63	19.15
Government/Surveys too invasive	48	14.59
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	0.61
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	0.61
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.30
Other	4	1.22
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	329	100.00
Nothing in it for me	209	63.29
No time	63	19.87
Government/Surveys too invasive	48	14.20
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	0.60
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	0.56
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.33
Other	4	1.16
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Florida)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	604	100.00
Nothing in it for me	339	56.13
No time	116	19.21
Government/Surveys too invasive	102	16.89
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	7	1.16
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	19	3.15
House too messy/Too ill	11	1.82
Other	10	1.66
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	604	100.00
Nothing in it for me	339	56.46
No time	116	19.75
Government/Surveys too invasive	102	15.98
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	7	1.14
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	19	3.21
House too messy/Too ill	11	1.79
Other	10	1.67
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Georgia)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	97	100.00
Nothing in it for me	60	61.86
No time	10	10.31
Government/Surveys too invasive	16	16.49
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	6	6.19
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.03
Other	4	4.12
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	97	100.00
Nothing in it for me	60	60.95
No time	10	10.20
Government/Surveys too invasive	16	17.90
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	6	5.71
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.27
Other	4	3.96
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Hawaii)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	119	100.00
Nothing in it for me	77	64.71
No time	19	15.97
Government/Surveys too invasive	11	9.24
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	0.84
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	9	7.56
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.84
Other	1	0.84
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	119	100.00
Nothing in it for me	77	65.84
No time	19	15.82
Government/Surveys too invasive	11	8.08
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	0.96
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	9	7.61
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.74
Other	1	0.96
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Idaho)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	59	100.00
Nothing in it for me	35	59.32
No time	8	13.56
Government/Surveys too invasive	13	22.03
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	3.39
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	1	1.69
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	59	100.00
Nothing in it for me	35	60.54
No time	8	12.84
Government/Surveys too invasive	13	21.78
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	3.21
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	1	1.63
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Illinois)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	669	100.00
Nothing in it for me	408	60.99
No time	100	14.95
Government/Surveys too invasive	95	14.20
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	8	1.20
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	38	5.68
House too messy/Too ill	7	1.05
Other	12	1.79
Missing	1	0.15

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	669	100.00
Nothing in it for me	408	60.47
No time	100	14.87
Government/Surveys too invasive	95	14.69
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	8	1.29
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	38	5.68
House too messy/Too ill	7	1.02
Other	12	1.83
Missing	1	0.15

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Indiana)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	73	100.00
Nothing in it for me	36	49.32
No time	9	12.33
Government/Surveys too invasive	16	21.92
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	9	12.33
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	2.74
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.37
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	73	100.00
Nothing in it for me	36	50.07
No time	9	12.37
Government/Surveys too invasive	16	22.80
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	9	10.96
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	2.54
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.25
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Iowa)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	83	100.00
Nothing in it for me	57	68.67
No time	19	22.89
Government/Surveys too invasive	5	6.02
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.20
Other	0	0.00
Missing	1	1.20

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	83	100.00
Nothing in it for me	57	68.51
No time	19	22.32
Government/Surveys too invasive	5	6.41
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.39
Other	0	0.00
Missing	1	1.37

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Kansas)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	77	100.00
Nothing in it for me	57	74.03
No time	5	6.49
Government/Surveys too invasive	9	11.69
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	4	5.19
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.30
Other	1	1.30
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	77	100.00
Nothing in it for me	57	74.36
No time	5	6.96
Government/Surveys too invasive	9	11.37
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	4	4.97
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.15
Other	1	1.19
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Kentucky)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	76	100.00
Nothing in it for me	21	27.63
No time	24	31.58
Government/Surveys too invasive	19	25.00
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	6.58
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.32
Other	6	7.89
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	76	100.00
Nothing in it for me	21	25.70
No time	24	33.84
Government/Surveys too invasive	19	25.46
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	6.82
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.17
Other	6	7.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Louisiana)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	84	100.00
Nothing in it for me	44	52.38
No time	17	20.24
Government/Surveys too invasive	14	16.67
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	9	10.71
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	84	100.00
Nothing in it for me	44	50.81
No time	17	21.91
Government/Surveys too invasive	14	15.62
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	9	11.66
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Maine)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	146	100.00
Nothing in it for me	65	44.52
No time	17	11.64
Government/Surveys too invasive	38	26.03
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	8	5.48
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.68
Other	17	11.64
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	146	100.00
Nothing in it for me	65	45.32
No time	17	11.51
Government/Surveys too invasive	38	24.88
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	8	5.74
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.72
Other	17	11.83
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Maryland)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	129	100.00
Nothing in it for me	106	82.17
No time	2	1.55
Government/Surveys too invasive	7	5.43
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	14	10.85
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	129	100.00
Nothing in it for me	106	82.60
No time	2	1.51
Government/Surveys too invasive	7	5.49
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	14	10.39
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Massachusetts)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	177	100.00
Nothing in it for me	146	82.49
No time	16	9.04
Government/Surveys too invasive	3	1.69
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.13
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	2.82
House too messy/Too ill	2	1.13
Other	3	1.69
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	177	100.00
Nothing in it for me	146	82.31
No time	16	9.15
Government/Surveys too invasive	3	1.68
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.23
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	2.81
House too messy/Too ill	2	1.18
Other	3	1.64
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Michigan)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	523	100.00
Nothing in it for me	315	60.23
No time	77	14.72
Government/Surveys too invasive	80	15.30
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	6	1.15
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	19	3.63
House too messy/Too ill	4	0.76
Other	22	4.21
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	523	100.00
Nothing in it for me	315	60.36
No time	77	14.57
Government/Surveys too invasive	80	15.30
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	6	1.09
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	19	3.66
House too messy/Too ill	4	0.74
Other	22	4.27
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Minnesota)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	92	100.00
Nothing in it for me	50	54.35
No time	11	11.96
Government/Surveys too invasive	15	16.30
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	4	4.35
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	10	10.87
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	2	2.17
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	92	100.00
Nothing in it for me	50	52.83
No time	11	12.65
Government/Surveys too invasive	15	16.72
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	4	4.49
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	10	10.64
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	2	2.66
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Mississippi)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	48	100.00
Nothing in it for me	23	47.92
No time	7	14.58
Government/Surveys too invasive	13	27.08
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	10.42
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	48	100.00
Nothing in it for me	23	48.12
No time	7	14.51
Government/Surveys too invasive	13	26.99
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	10.38
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Missouri)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	89	100.00
Nothing in it for me	60	67.42
No time	9	10.11
Government/Surveys too invasive	8	8.99
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	9	10.11
House too messy/Too ill	2	2.25
Other	1	1.12
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	89	100.00
Nothing in it for me	60	67.79
No time	9	10.37
Government/Surveys too invasive	8	8.80
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	9	9.77
House too messy/Too ill	2	2.18
Other	1	1.09
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Montana)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	77	100.00
Nothing in it for me	44	57.14
No time	10	12.99
Government/Surveys too invasive	22	28.57
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.30
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	77	100.00
Nothing in it for me	44	56.63
No time	10	13.50
Government/Surveys too invasive	22	28.62
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.25
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Nebraska)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	68	100.00
Nothing in it for me	51	75.00
No time	6	8.82
Government/Surveys too invasive	3	4.41
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	2.94
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	2.94
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	4	5.88
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	68	100.00
Nothing in it for me	51	74.67
No time	6	9.12
Government/Surveys too invasive	3	4.40
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	2.99
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	2.99
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	4	5.84
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Nevada)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	52	100.00
Nothing in it for me	34	65.38
No time	14	26.92
Government/Surveys too invasive	1	1.92
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.92
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	1	1.92
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	1	1.92
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	52	100.00
Nothing in it for me	34	66.95
No time	14	25.30
Government/Surveys too invasive	1	2.53
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	2.01
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	1	1.62
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	1	1.59
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (New Hampshire)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	101	100.00
Nothing in it for me	83	82.18
No time	6	5.94
Government/Surveys too invasive	10	9.90
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	1.98
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	101	100.00
Nothing in it for me	83	84.11
No time	6	5.77
Government/Surveys too invasive	10	8.30
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	1.83
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (New Jersey)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	213	100.00
Nothing in it for me	155	72.77
No time	25	11.74
Government/Surveys too invasive	12	5.63
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	0.94
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	2.35
House too messy/Too ill	5	2.35
Other	7	3.29
Missing	2	0.94

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	213	100.00
Nothing in it for me	155	72.48
No time	25	11.85
Government/Surveys too invasive	12	5.69
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	0.97
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	2.21
House too messy/Too ill	5	2.39
Other	7	3.29
Missing	2	1.10

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (New Mexico)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	50	100.00
Nothing in it for me	44	88.00
No time	2	4.00
Government/Surveys too invasive	2	4.00
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	2	4.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	50	100.00
Nothing in it for me	44	86.81
No time	2	4.42
Government/Surveys too invasive	2	4.35
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	2	4.42
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (New York)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	878	100.00
Nothing in it for me	590	67.20
No time	86	9.79
Government/Surveys too invasive	104	11.85
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	9	1.03
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	35	3.99
House too messy/Too ill	4	0.46
Other	50	5.69
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	878	100.00
Nothing in it for me	590	67.49
No time	86	9.75
Government/Surveys too invasive	104	11.83
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	9	0.99
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	35	3.88
House too messy/Too ill	4	0.45
Other	50	5.62
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (North Carolina)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	75	100.00
Nothing in it for me	45	60.00
No time	10	13.33
Government/Surveys too invasive	11	14.67
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.33
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	3	4.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	5	6.67
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	75	100.00
Nothing in it for me	45	59.04
No time	10	13.44
Government/Surveys too invasive	11	15.07
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.50
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	3	4.17
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	5	6.78
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (North Dakota)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	68	100.00
Nothing in it for me	47	69.12
No time	6	8.82
Government/Surveys too invasive	12	17.65
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	2.94
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	1	1.47
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	68	100.00
Nothing in it for me	47	67.95
No time	6	9.06
Government/Surveys too invasive	12	18.58
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	2.91
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	1	1.50
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Ohio)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	316	100.00
Nothing in it for me	190	60.13
No time	29	9.18
Government/Surveys too invasive	63	19.94
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	11	3.48
House too messy/Too ill	3	0.95
Other	20	6.33
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	316	100.00
Nothing in it for me	190	60.55
No time	29	9.50
Government/Surveys too invasive	63	19.45
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	11	3.53
House too messy/Too ill	3	0.86
Other	20	6.11
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Oklahoma)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	120	100.00
Nothing in it for me	86	71.67
No time	16	13.33
Government/Surveys too invasive	8	6.67
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.67
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	1	0.83
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	7	5.83
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	120	100.00
Nothing in it for me	86	72.00
No time	16	13.29
Government/Surveys too invasive	8	7.07
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.82
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	1	0.63
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	7	5.19
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Oregon)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	50	100.00
Nothing in it for me	19	38.00
No time	10	20.00
Government/Surveys too invasive	15	30.00
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	10.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	1	2.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	50	100.00
Nothing in it for me	19	41.85
No time	10	18.80
Government/Surveys too invasive	15	29.14
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	8.67
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	1	1.55
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Pennsylvania)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	374	100.00
Nothing in it for me	211	56.42
No time	36	9.63
Government/Surveys too invasive	54	14.44
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	7	1.87
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	55	14.71
House too messy/Too ill	2	0.53
Other	9	2.41
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	374	100.00
Nothing in it for me	211	55.94
No time	36	9.35
Government/Surveys too invasive	54	14.63
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	7	1.81
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	55	14.71
House too messy/Too ill	2	0.57
Other	9	3.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Rhode Island)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	166	100.00
Nothing in it for me	109	65.66
No time	34	20.48
Government/Surveys too invasive	9	5.42
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.20
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	9	5.42
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.60
Other	2	1.20
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	166	100.00
Nothing in it for me	109	66.39
No time	34	19.64
Government/Surveys too invasive	9	5.41
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.20
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	9	5.20
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.73
Other	2	1.42
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (South Carolina)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	54	100.00
Nothing in it for me	40	74.07
No time	6	11.11
Government/Surveys too invasive	5	9.26
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.85
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	3.70
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	54	100.00
Nothing in it for me	40	75.53
No time	6	10.21
Government/Surveys too invasive	5	9.27
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.60
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	3.39
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (South Dakota)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	63	100.00
Nothing in it for me	48	76.19
No time	6	9.52
Government/Surveys too invasive	4	6.35
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	3.17
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	3.17
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.59
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	63	100.00
Nothing in it for me	48	76.68
No time	6	9.00
Government/Surveys too invasive	4	6.25
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	3.08
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	3.05
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.93
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Tennessee)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	70	100.00
Nothing in it for me	35	50.00
No time	25	35.71
Government/Surveys too invasive	8	11.43
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	1	1.43
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	1	1.43
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	70	100.00
Nothing in it for me	35	60.76
No time	25	28.44
Government/Surveys too invasive	8	8.66
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	1	1.12
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	1	1.02
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Texas)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	253	100.00
Nothing in it for me	145	57.31
No time	61	24.11
Government/Surveys too invasive	24	9.49
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	4	1.58
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	12	4.74
House too messy/Too ill	3	1.19
Other	4	1.58
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	253	100.00
Nothing in it for me	145	56.85
No time	61	24.10
Government/Surveys too invasive	24	9.84
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	4	1.57
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	12	4.94
House too messy/Too ill	3	1.25
Other	4	1.46
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Utah)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	45	100.00
Nothing in it for me	12	26.67
No time	6	13.33
Government/Surveys too invasive	22	48.89
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	2.22
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	4	8.89
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	45	100.00
Nothing in it for me	12	23.78
No time	6	13.87
Government/Surveys too invasive	22	50.38
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	2.45
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	4	9.53
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Vermont)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	110	100.00
Nothing in it for me	67	60.91
No time	17	15.45
Government/Surveys too invasive	21	19.09
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	4.55
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	110	100.00
Nothing in it for me	67	61.22
No time	17	15.20
Government/Surveys too invasive	21	18.83
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	5	4.75
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	0	0.00
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Virginia)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	164	100.00
Nothing in it for me	85	51.83
No time	32	19.51
Government/Surveys too invasive	37	22.56
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	1.22
House too messy/Too ill	2	1.22
Other	5	3.05
Missing	1	0.61

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	164	100.00
Nothing in it for me	85	54.10
No time	32	17.31
Government/Surveys too invasive	37	23.21
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	0	0.00
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	1.08
House too messy/Too ill	2	1.25
Other	5	2.55
Missing	1	0.49

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Washington)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	95	100.00
Nothing in it for me	53	55.79
No time	3	3.16
Government/Surveys too invasive	27	28.42
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	2.11
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	2.11
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	8	8.42
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	95	100.00
Nothing in it for me	53	55.37
No time	3	3.24
Government/Surveys too invasive	27	30.00
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.92
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	2	1.94
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	8	7.53
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (West Virginia)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	103	100.00
Nothing in it for me	52	50.49
No time	16	15.53
Government/Surveys too invasive	21	20.39
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	1.94
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	1	0.97
House too messy/Too ill	1	0.97
Other	10	9.71
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	103	100.00
Nothing in it for me	52	49.60
No time	16	15.34
Government/Surveys too invasive	21	21.27
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	2	2.39
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	1	0.84
House too messy/Too ill	1	1.03
Other	10	9.54
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Wisconsin)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	96	100.00
Nothing in it for me	60	62.50
No time	9	9.38
Government/Surveys too invasive	14	14.58
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.04
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	9	9.38
House too messy/Too ill	2	2.08
Other	1	1.04
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	96	100.00
Nothing in it for me	60	61.30
No time	9	10.24
Government/Surveys too invasive	14	14.27
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.04
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	9	10.07
House too messy/Too ill	2	1.95
Other	1	1.13
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.14 and 7.15 2003 Screening Refusal Results (Wyoming)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	75	100.00
Nothing in it for me	46	61.33
No time	8	10.67
Government/Surveys too invasive	18	24.00
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.33
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	2	2.67
Missing	0	0.00

(Weighted Percentages)
	Total
	Count	%
Refusal Cases	75	100.00
Nothing in it for me	46	60.91
No time	8	10.79
Government/Surveys too invasive	18	24.42
Gatekeeper/Household member won't allow participation	1	1.25
Confidentiality or survey legitimacy concerns	0	0.00
House too messy/Too ill	0	0.00
Other	2	2.63
Missing	0	0.00

**Table 7.16 2003 Interview Results, by Gender and Age (Unweighted Percentages)**
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Male
Eligible Cases	13,070	100.00	13,197	100.00	13,741	100.00	40,008	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	11,654	89.17	10,838	82.12	10,135	73.76	32,627	81.55
71 – No One at DU*	237	1.81	730	5.53	716	5.21	1,683	4.21
77 – Refusal	259	1.98	1,268	9.61	2,418	17.60	3,945	9.86
Other	920	7.04	361	2.74	472	3.43	1,753	4.38
Female
Eligible Cases	12,317	100.00	14,062	100.00	15,244	100.00	41,623	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	11,042	89.65	12,103	86.07	12,012	78.80	35,157	84.47
71 – No One at DU*	231	1.88	597	4.25	540	3.54	1,368	3.29
77 – Refusal	227	1.84	1,099	7.82	2,162	14.18	3,488	8.38
Other	817	6.63	263	1.87	530	3.48	1,610	3.87
Total
Eligible Cases	25,387	100.00	27,259	100.00	28,985	100.00	81,631	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	22,696	89.40	22,941	84.16	22,147	76.41	67,784	83.04
71 – No One at DU*	468	1.84	1,327	4.87	1,256	4.33	3,051	3.74
77 – Refusal	486	1.91	2,367	8.68	4,580	15.80	7,433	9.11
Other	1,737	6.84	624	2.29	1,002	3.46	3,363	4.12
DU = dwelling unit. *Results include interviewer codes for no one at home after repeated visits and codes for respondent unavailable after repeated visits.

**Table 7.17 2003 Interview Results, by Gender and Age (Weighted Percentages)**
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Male
Eligible Cases	13,070	100.00	13,197	100.00	13,741	100.00	40,008	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	11,654	89.68	10,838	81.51	10,135	72.55	32,627	75.72
71 – No One at DU*	237	1.64	730	5.56	716	4.79	1,683	4.54
77 – Refusal	259	1.72	1,268	10.04	2,418	18.18	3,945	15.20
Other	920	6.97	361	2.90	472	4.48	1,753	4.54
Female
Eligible Cases	12,317	100.00	14,062	100.00	15,244	100.00	41,623	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	11,042	89.45	12,103	85.43	12,012	76.51	35,157	78.96
71 – No One at DU*	231	2.11	597	4.56	540	3.59	1,368	3.57
77 – Refusal	227	1.77	1,099	7.94	2,162	15.39	3,488	13.07
Other	817	6.67	263	2.08	530	4.50	1,610	4.41
Total
Eligible Cases	25,387	100.00	27,259	100.00	28,985	100.00	81,631	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	22,696	89.57	22,941	83.47	22,147	74.63	67,784	77.39
71 – No One at DU*	468	1.87	1,327	5.06	1,256	4.16	3,051	4.04
77 – Refusal	486	1.74	2,367	8.99	4,580	16.71	7,433	14.10
Other	1,737	6.82	624	2.49	1,002	4.49	3,363	4.47
DU = dwelling unit. *Results include interviewer codes for no one at home after repeated visits and codes for respondent unavailable after repeated visits.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Total U.S.)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	25,387	100.00	27,259	100.00	28,985	100.00	81,631	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	22,696	89.40	22,941	84.16	22,147	76.41	67,784	83.04
71 – No One at DU	158	0.62	562	2.06	522	1.80	1,242	1.52
72 – Resp Unavailable	310	1.22	765	2.81	734	2.53	1,809	2.22
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	2	0.01	6	0.02	25	0.09	33	0.04
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	150	0.59	144	0.53	461	1.59	755	0.92
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	6	0.02	102	0.37	69	0.24	177	0.22
76 – Language Barrier – Other	11	0.04	77	0.28	276	0.95	364	0.45
77 – Refusal	486	1.91	2,367	8.68	4,580	15.80	7,433	9.11
78 – Parental Refusal	1,476	5.81	0	0.00	0	0.00	1,476	1.81
Other	92	0.36	295	1.08	171	0.59	558	0.68

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	25,387	100.00	27,259	100.00	28,985	100.00	81,631	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	22,696	89.57	22,941	83.47	22,147	74.63	67,784	77.39
71 – No One at DU	158	0.62	562	2.07	522	1.65	1,242	1.60
72 – Resp Unavailable	310	1.25	765	2.99	734	2.51	1,809	2.44
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	2	0.01	6	0.02	25	0.11	33	0.09
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	150	0.60	144	0.57	461	2.21	755	1.82
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	6	0.02	102	0.39	69	0.20	177	0.21
76 – Language Barrier – Other	11	0.07	77	0.34	276	1.41	364	1.13
77 – Refusal	486	1.74	2,367	8.99	4,580	16.71	7,433	14.10
78 – Parental Refusal	1,476	5.81	0	0.00	0	0.00	1,476	0.61
Other	92	0.31	295	1.17	171	0.56	558	0.62
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Alabama)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	324	100.00	394	100.00	311	100.00	1,029	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	297	91.67	340	86.29	242	77.81	879	85.42
71 – No One at DU	5	1.54	10	2.54	7	2.25	22	2.14
72 – Resp Unavailable	6	1.85	10	2.54	5	1.61	21	2.04
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	0	0.00	3	0.76	12	3.86	15	1.46
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	6	1.52	1	0.32	7	0.68
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
77 – Refusal	3	0.93	23	5.84	43	13.83	69	6.71
78 – Parental Refusal	13	4.01	0	0.00	0	0.00	13	1.26
Other	0	0.00	2	0.51	1	0.32	3	0.29

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	324	100.00	394	100.00	311	100.00	1,029	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	297	92.61	340	86.10	242	76.33	879	79.60
71 – No One at DU	5	1.49	10	3.40	7	1.76	22	1.98
72 – Resp Unavailable	6	1.40	10	2.36	5	1.22	21	1.42
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	0	0.00	3	0.80	12	5.09	15	3.88
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	6	1.77	1	0.66	7	0.76
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
77 – Refusal	3	0.88	23	5.26	43	14.55	69	11.64
78 – Parental Refusal	13	3.61	0	0.00	0	0.00	13	0.39
Other	0	0.00	2	0.31	1	0.38	3	0.33
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Alaska)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	348	100.00	378	100.00	372	100.00	1,098	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	298	85.63	314	83.07	271	72.85	883	80.42
71 – No One at DU	6	1.72	10	2.65	24	6.45	40	3.64
72 – Resp Unavailable	5	1.44	16	4.23	11	2.96	32	2.91
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	1	0.29	3	0.79	3	0.81	7	0.64
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	2	0.53	1	0.27	3	0.27
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	1	0.27	1	0.09
77 – Refusal	13	3.74	30	7.94	59	15.86	102	9.29
78 – Parental Refusal	25	7.18	0	0.00	0	0.00	25	2.28
Other	0	0.00	3	0.79	2	0.54	5	0.46

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	348	100.00	378	100.00	372	100.00	1,098	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	298	86.80	314	82.66	271	71.30	883	75.00
71 – No One at DU	6	1.58	10	1.85	24	5.64	40	4.56
72 – Resp Unavailable	5	1.31	16	5.34	11	2.73	32	2.89
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	1	0.31	3	0.73	3	1.85	7	1.48
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	2	0.37	1	0.21	3	0.20
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	1	0.30	1	0.22
77 – Refusal	13	3.26	30	8.33	59	17.65	102	14.38
78 – Parental Refusal	25	6.75	0	0.00	0	0.00	25	0.94
Other	0	0.00	3	0.72	2	0.33	5	0.34
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Arizona)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	346	100.00	377	100.00	334	100.00	1,057	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	314	90.75	317	84.08	266	79.64	897	84.86
71 – No One at DU	2	0.58	11	2.92	3	0.90	16	1.51
72 – Resp Unavailable	5	1.45	8	2.12	12	3.59	25	2.37
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	1	0.29	0	0.00	4	1.20	5	0.47
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	1	0.27	0	0.00	1	0.09
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	3	0.90	3	0.28
77 – Refusal	7	2.02	35	9.28	45	13.47	87	8.23
78 – Parental Refusal	16	4.62	0	0.00	0	0.00	16	1.51
Other	1	0.29	5	1.33	1	0.30	7	0.66

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	346	100.00	377	100.00	334	100.00	1,057	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	314	91.48	317	84.15	266	78.82	897	81.20
71 – No One at DU	2	0.42	11	2.39	3	0.87	16	1.05
72 – Resp Unavailable	5	1.10	8	2.13	12	3.26	25	2.82
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	1	0.36	0	0.00	4	1.25	5	0.95
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	1	0.36	0	0.00	1	0.06
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	3	1.08	3	0.78
77 – Refusal	7	1.54	35	9.44	45	14.54	87	12.16
78 – Parental Refusal	16	4.84	0	0.00	0	0.00	16	0.60
Other	1	0.27	5	1.53	1	0.18	7	0.40
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Arkansas)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	352	100.00	356	100.00	384	100.00	1,092	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	320	90.91	301	84.55	301	78.39	922	84.43
71 – No One at DU	1	0.28	16	4.49	9	2.34	26	2.38
72 – Resp Unavailable	11	3.13	13	3.65	14	3.65	38	3.48
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	1	0.28	3	0.84	7	1.82	11	1.01
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	4	1.12	3	0.78	7	0.64
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
77 – Refusal	0	0.00	17	4.78	49	12.76	66	6.04
78 – Parental Refusal	19	5.40	0	0.00	0	0.00	19	1.74
Other	0	0.00	2	0.56	1	0.26	3	0.27

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	352	100.00	356	100.00	384	100.00	1,092	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	320	91.18	301	85.42	301	77.24	922	79.84
71 – No One at DU	1	0.26	16	4.73	9	2.60	26	2.64
72 – Resp Unavailable	11	2.92	13	3.23	14	2.83	38	2.90
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	1	0.30	3	0.99	7	2.80	11	2.28
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	4	0.67	3	0.41	7	0.40
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
77 – Refusal	0	0.00	17	4.44	49	13.94	66	11.17
78 – Parental Refusal	19	5.35	0	0.00	0	0.00	19	0.57
Other	0	0.00	2	0.52	1	0.18	3	0.21
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (California)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	1,381	100.00	1,463	100.00	1,627	100.00	4,471	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	1,236	89.50	1,195	81.68	1,169	71.85	3,600	80.52
71 – No One at DU	11	0.80	16	1.09	23	1.41	50	1.12
72 – Resp Unavailable	13	0.94	40	2.73	43	2.64	96	2.15
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	5	0.36	4	0.27	26	1.60	35	0.78
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	0	0.00	2	0.12	2	0.04
76 – Language Barrier – Other	1	0.07	11	0.75	53	3.26	65	1.45
77 – Refusal	22	1.59	168	11.48	298	18.32	488	10.91
78 – Parental Refusal	88	6.37	0	0.00	0	0.00	88	1.97
Other	5	0.36	29	1.98	13	0.80	47	1.05

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	1,381	100.00	1,463	100.00	1,627	100.00	4,471	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	1,236	89.71	1,195	81.65	1,169	69.91	3,600	73.76
71 – No One at DU	11	0.87	16	1.01	23	1.25	50	1.17
72 – Resp Unavailable	13	0.95	40	2.69	43	2.31	96	2.21
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	5	0.29	4	0.26	26	2.10	35	1.64
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	0	0.00	2	0.09	2	0.07
76 – Language Barrier – Other	1	0.11	11	0.68	53	4.26	65	3.30
77 – Refusal	22	1.58	168	11.79	298	19.21	488	16.20
78 – Parental Refusal	88	6.16	0	0.00	0	0.00	88	0.69
Other	5	0.32	29	1.93	13	0.87	47	0.95
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Colorado)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	327	100.00	379	100.00	397	100.00	1,103	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	292	89.30	305	80.47	314	79.09	911	82.59
71 – No One at DU	1	0.31	12	3.17	15	3.78	28	2.54
72 – Resp Unavailable	3	0.92	11	2.90	6	1.51	20	1.81
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	0	0.00	2	0.53	3	0.76	5	0.45
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	12	3.17	4	1.01	16	1.45
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	1	0.26	2	0.50	3	0.27
77 – Refusal	13	3.98	35	9.23	52	13.10	100	9.07
78 – Parental Refusal	16	4.89	0	0.00	0	0.00	16	1.45
Other	2	0.61	1	0.26	1	0.25	4	0.36

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	327	100.00	379	100.00	397	100.00	1,103	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	292	88.53	305	79.29	314	77.43	911	78.79
71 – No One at DU	1	0.40	12	2.82	15	3.57	28	3.16
72 – Resp Unavailable	3	0.85	11	2.80	6	1.56	20	1.65
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	0	0.00	2	0.35	3	1.30	5	1.05
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	12	4.02	4	0.94	16	1.25
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	1	0.19	2	0.36	3	0.30
77 – Refusal	13	3.98	35	10.26	52	14.65	100	13.00
78 – Parental Refusal	16	5.57	0	0.00	0	0.00	16	0.56
Other	2	0.67	1	0.27	1	0.18	4	0.24
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Connecticut)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	313	100.00	423	100.00	392	100.00	1,128	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	279	89.14	353	83.45	301	76.79	933	82.71
71 – No One at DU	1	0.32	4	0.95	3	0.77	8	0.71
72 – Resp Unavailable	2	0.64	14	3.31	12	3.06	28	2.48
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	2	0.47	1	0.26	3	0.27
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	0	0.00	0	0.00	4	1.02	4	0.35
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	3	0.71	1	0.26	4	0.35
76 – Language Barrier – Other	1	0.32	1	0.24	6	1.53	8	0.71
77 – Refusal	5	1.60	42	9.93	59	15.05	106	9.40
78 – Parental Refusal	22	7.03	0	0.00	0	0.00	22	1.95
Other	3	0.96	4	0.95	5	1.28	12	1.06

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	313	100.00	423	100.00	392	100.00	1,128	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	279	88.47	353	83.64	301	73.62	933	76.25
71 – No One at DU	1	0.34	4	0.77	3	0.61	8	0.60
72 – Resp Unavailable	2	0.83	14	3.36	12	2.36	28	2.33
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	2	0.43	1	0.19	3	0.20
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	0	0.00	0	0.00	4	1.80	4	1.41
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	3	1.05	1	0.04	4	0.16
76 – Language Barrier – Other	1	0.20	1	0.17	6	1.90	8	1.53
77 – Refusal	5	1.79	42	9.60	59	18.75	106	16.01
78 – Parental Refusal	22	7.56	0	0.00	0	0.00	22	0.74
Other	3	0.80	4	0.97	5	0.74	12	0.77
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Delaware)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	344	100.00	373	100.00	388	100.00	1,105	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	305	88.66	315	84.45	291	75.00	911	82.44
71 – No One at DU	4	1.16	9	2.41	10	2.58	23	2.08
72 – Resp Unavailable	3	0.87	10	2.68	11	2.84	24	2.17
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	1	0.29	3	0.80	14	3.61	18	1.63
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	1	0.29	1	0.27	0	0.00	2	0.18
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	1	0.26	1	0.09
77 – Refusal	3	0.87	30	8.04	60	15.46	93	8.42
78 – Parental Refusal	26	7.56	0	0.00	0	0.00	26	2.35
Other	1	0.29	5	1.34	1	0.26	7	0.63

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	344	100.00	373	100.00	388	100.00	1,105	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	305	88.69	315	84.55	291	71.54	911	75.12
71 – No One at DU	4	1.05	9	2.88	10	2.07	23	2.08
72 – Resp Unavailable	3	0.72	10	2.48	11	2.95	24	2.65
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	1	0.21	3	0.74	14	6.04	18	4.70
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	1	0.09	1	0.07	0	0.00	2	0.02
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	1	0.26	1	0.20
77 – Refusal	3	0.61	30	8.23	60	15.61	93	13.02
78 – Parental Refusal	26	8.35	0	0.00	0	0.00	26	0.88
Other	1	0.27	5	1.04	1	1.53	7	1.33
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (District of Columbia)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	370	100.00	373	100.00	373	100.00	1,116	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	326	88.11	326	87.40	297	79.62	949	85.04
71 – No One at DU	5	1.35	7	1.88	6	1.61	18	1.61
72 – Resp Unavailable	5	1.35	9	2.41	10	2.68	24	2.15
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	3	0.81	2	0.54	2	0.54	7	0.63
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	3	0.80	3	0.27
77 – Refusal	4	1.08	28	7.51	51	13.67	83	7.44
78 – Parental Refusal	26	7.03	0	0.00	0	0.00	26	2.33
Other	1	0.27	1	0.27	4	1.07	6	0.54

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	370	100.00	373	100.00	373	100.00	1,116	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	326	88.64	326	87.28	297	78.33	949	80.38
71 – No One at DU	5	1.05	7	1.76	6	1.14	18	1.23
72 – Resp Unavailable	5	1.14	9	2.47	10	2.44	24	2.35
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	3	0.87	2	0.78	2	0.73	7	0.75
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	0	0.00	3	1.49	3	1.17
77 – Refusal	4	1.08	28	7.37	51	14.39	83	12.41
78 – Parental Refusal	26	7.04	0	0.00	0	0.00	26	0.50
Other	1	0.19	1	0.34	4	1.48	6	1.22
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Florida)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	1,377	100.00	1,418	100.00	1,619	100.00	4,414	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	1,203	87.36	1,171	82.58	1,167	72.08	3,541	80.22
71 – No One at DU	4	0.29	13	0.92	13	0.80	30	0.68
72 – Resp Unavailable	16	1.16	40	2.82	45	2.78	101	2.29
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	5	0.31	5	0.11
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	10	0.73	10	0.71	37	2.29	57	1.29
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
76 – Language Barrier – Other	1	0.07	7	0.49	17	1.05	25	0.57
77 – Refusal	12	0.87	158	11.14	313	19.33	483	10.94
78 – Parental Refusal	124	9.01	0	0.00	0	0.00	124	2.81
Other	7	0.51	19	1.34	22	1.36	48	1.09

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	1,377	100.00	1,418	100.00	1,619	100.00	4,414	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	1,203	87.23	1,171	81.73	1,167	71.02	3,541	73.68
71 – No One at DU	4	0.30	13	0.90	13	0.88	30	0.83
72 – Resp Unavailable	16	1.11	40	2.81	45	2.49	101	2.40
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	5	0.38	5	0.30
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	10	0.71	10	0.85	37	2.84	57	2.43
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
76 – Language Barrier – Other	1	0.08	7	0.51	17	1.10	25	0.94
77 – Refusal	12	0.87	158	11.98	313	20.13	483	17.47
78 – Parental Refusal	124	9.15	0	0.00	0	0.00	124	0.85
Other	7	0.55	19	1.23	22	1.15	48	1.10
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Georgia)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	342	100.00	323	100.00	423	100.00	1,088	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	308	90.06	267	82.66	327	77.30	902	82.90
71 – No One at DU	0	0.00	6	1.86	3	0.71	9	0.83
72 – Resp Unavailable	10	2.92	14	4.33	17	4.02	41	3.77
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	1	0.29	2	0.62	9	2.13	12	1.10
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	1	0.31	1	0.24	2	0.18
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	1	0.31	6	1.42	7	0.64
77 – Refusal	3	0.88	27	8.36	57	13.48	87	8.00
78 – Parental Refusal	18	5.26	0	0.00	0	0.00	18	1.65
Other	2	0.58	5	1.55	3	0.71	10	0.92

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	342	100.00	323	100.00	423	100.00	1,088	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	308	88.43	267	84.93	327	77.32	902	79.46
71 – No One at DU	0	0.00	6	1.48	3	0.57	9	0.63
72 – Resp Unavailable	10	2.99	14	4.58	17	4.36	41	4.25
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	1	0.26	2	0.59	9	2.32	12	1.88
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	1	0.16	1	0.11	2	0.11
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	1	0.29	6	1.10	7	0.88
77 – Refusal	3	0.99	27	6.82	57	13.58	87	11.40
78 – Parental Refusal	18	6.70	0	0.00	0	0.00	18	0.70
Other	2	0.63	5	1.14	3	0.64	10	0.70
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Hawaii)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	388	100.00	329	100.00	425	100.00	1,142	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	353	90.98	275	83.59	300	70.59	928	81.26
71 – No One at DU	0	0.00	4	1.22	2	0.47	6	0.53
72 – Resp Unavailable	7	1.80	16	4.86	13	3.06	36	3.15
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	3	0.77	1	0.30	8	1.88	12	1.05
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	1	0.30	2	0.47	3	0.26
76 – Language Barrier – Other	2	0.52	2	0.61	17	4.00	21	1.84
77 – Refusal	5	1.29	27	8.21	82	19.29	114	9.98
78 – Parental Refusal	17	4.38	0	0.00	0	0.00	17	1.49
Other	1	0.26	3	0.91	1	0.24	5	0.44

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	388	100.00	329	100.00	425	100.00	1,142	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	353	90.91	275	83.63	300	69.33	928	73.21
71 – No One at DU	0	0.00	4	1.27	2	0.31	6	0.39
72 – Resp Unavailable	7	1.60	16	4.95	13	2.82	36	2.95
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	3	0.83	1	0.10	8	3.10	12	2.52
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	1	0.14	2	0.33	3	0.27
76 – Language Barrier – Other	2	0.99	2	0.69	17	4.61	21	3.78
77 – Refusal	5	1.40	27	7.77	82	19.40	114	16.20
78 – Parental Refusal	17	3.92	0	0.00	0	0.00	17	0.40
Other	1	0.36	3	1.46	1	0.10	5	0.28
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Idaho)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	331	100.00	348	100.00	433	100.00	1,112	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	299	90.33	287	82.47	326	75.29	912	82.01
71 – No One at DU	3	0.91	14	4.02	4	0.92	21	1.89
72 – Resp Unavailable	5	1.51	6	1.72	14	3.23	25	2.25
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	0	0.00	4	1.15	7	1.62	11	0.99
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	2	0.57	4	0.92	6	0.54
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	1	0.29	1	0.23	2	0.18
77 – Refusal	7	2.11	30	8.62	71	16.40	108	9.71
78 – Parental Refusal	14	4.23	0	0.00	0	0.00	14	1.26
Other	3	0.91	4	1.15	6	1.39	13	1.17

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	331	100.00	348	100.00	433	100.00	1,112	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	299	90.50	287	81.40	326	74.87	912	77.63
71 – No One at DU	3	0.68	14	3.93	4	0.77	21	1.21
72 – Resp Unavailable	5	1.42	6	2.24	14	2.95	25	2.67
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00	0	0.00
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	0	0.00	4	1.58	7	2.55	11	2.12
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	2	0.51	4	0.74	6	0.62
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	1	0.24	1	0.18	2	0.17
77 – Refusal	7	2.17	30	8.49	71	17.09	108	14.12
78 – Parental Refusal	14	3.67	0	0.00	0	0.00	14	0.43
Other	3	1.57	4	1.62	6	0.85	13	1.04
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Illinois)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	1,423	100.00	1,537	100.00	1,692	100.00	4,652	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	1,238	87.00	1,242	80.81	1,231	72.75	3,711	79.77
71 – No One at DU	6	0.42	40	2.60	50	2.96	96	2.06
72 – Resp Unavailable	9	0.63	55	3.58	36	2.13	100	2.15
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	1	0.07	4	0.24	5	0.11
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	14	0.98	12	0.78	28	1.65	54	1.16
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	2	0.13	1	0.06	3	0.06
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	3	0.20	27	1.60	30	0.64
77 – Refusal	37	2.60	155	10.08	300	17.73	492	10.58
78 – Parental Refusal	111	7.80	0	0.00	0	0.00	111	2.39
Other	8	0.56	27	1.76	15	0.89	50	1.07

(Weighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	1,423	100.00	1,537	100.00	1,692	100.00	4,652	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	1,238	86.69	1,242	81.48	1,231	71.43	3,711	74.36
71 – No One at DU	6	0.35	40	2.48	50	2.70	96	2.42
72 – Resp Unavailable	9	0.81	55	3.41	36	2.06	100	2.11
73 – Break Off (Partial Int)	0	0.00	1	0.05	4	0.25	5	0.20
74 – Phy/Ment Incompetent	14	1.07	12	0.75	28	2.27	54	1.95
75 – Language Barrier – Hispanic	0	0.00	2	0.13	1	0.04	3	0.05
76 – Language Barrier – Other	0	0.00	3	0.18	27	2.08	30	1.61
77 – Refusal	37	2.79	155	9.86	300	18.20	492	15.48
78 – Parental Refusal	111	7.69	0	0.00	0	0.00	111	0.81
Other	8	0.59	27	1.65	15	0.96	50	1.01
DU = dwelling unit.

**Table 7.18 and 7.19 2003 Interview Results, by Age (Indiana)**
(Unweighted Percentages)
	12–17		18–25		26+		Total
	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%	Count	%
Total Sample
Eligible Cases	338	100.00	365	100.00	379	100.00	1,082	100.00
70 – Interview Complete	308	91.12	292	80.00	303	79.95	903	83.46
71 – No One at DU	3	0.89	12	3.29	11	2.90	26	2.40